Flutterby™! : "AI" still sucks

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

"AI" still sucks

2024-04-15 17:33:12.477876+02 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Reading Stratechery: Gemini 1.5 and Google’s Nature, I'm struck by how many conditionals there are. It's about how Google's large context window for their LLM system could enable things like reading a vendor's TOS and checking for compliance with policy, or really pie in the sky stuff, and

Again, leave aside the implausibility of this demo: the key takeaway is the capabilities unlocked when the model is able to have all of the context around a problem while working; this is only possible with — and here the name is appropriate — a long context window, and that is ultimately enabled by Google’s infrastructure.

This reminds me a lot about the discussion around self-driving automobiles, where, leaving aside the issues of geometry and pollution and whatnot, is it possible that autonomous cars could be better drivers than humans? Sure. But every time someone digs through the deliberate obfuscation of the stats and looks at the numbers of what's happening right now, we're a long way the other side of that.

Or, of course, the discussion around cryptocurrencies.

Anyway, Futurism: Disillusioned Businesses Discovering That AI Kind of Sucks:

"'This is super cool, but I can't actually get it to work reliably enough to roll out to our customers.'"

[ related topics: Nature and environment Work, productivity and environment Automobiles Community Artificial Intelligence ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Add your own comment:

(If anyone ever actually uses Webmention/indie-action to post here, please email me)




Format with:

(You should probably use "Text" mode: URLs will be mostly recognized and linked, _underscore quoted_ text is looked up in a glossary, _underscore quoted_ (http://xyz.pdq) becomes a link, without the link in the parenthesis it becomes a <cite> tag. All <cite>ed text will point to the Flutterby knowledge base. Two enters (ie: a blank line) gets you a new paragraph, special treatment for paragraphs that are manually indented or start with "#" (as in "#include" or "#!/usr/bin/perl"), "/* " or ">" (as in a quoted message) or look like lists, or within a paragraph you can use a number of HTML tags:

p, img, br, hr, a, sub, sup, tt, i, b, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, cite, em, strong, code, samp, kbd, pre, blockquote, address, ol, dl, ul, dt, dd, li, dir, menu, table, tr, td, th

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.