Need to shower
2007-06-16 18:20:35.299806+00 by Dan Lyke 2 comments
I feel so dirty. I've just written my first C++ code that depends upon member object instantiation order.
2007-06-16 18:20:35.299806+00 by Dan Lyke 2 comments
I feel so dirty. I've just written my first C++ code that depends upon member object instantiation order.
[ related topics: Software Engineering ]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2007-06-16 20:40:59.797692+00 by: ziffle
Wash your hands? But all code depends upon that up to a point.
#Comment Re: made: 2007-06-16 23:03:26.900138+00 by: Dan Lyke
Yeah, but usually it's much more explicit than this. Although I do believe it's the right thing to do in this case, it's kind of like depending on the fact that I know << versus + operator precedence (Ya know, I actually no longer have a copy of K&R, but I think it was page 73...), even though other programmers may be unsure of it.
(Yes, I am getting old [grin])