Flutterby™! : suid perl alternatives

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

suid perl alternatives

2012-01-03 20:41:01.005274+01 by Dan Lyke 4 comments

So apparently, somewhere between Ubuntu 11.10 and the Perl community, perl-suid has disappeared. What's the modern accepted alternative if you want to, say, have a CGI script (run from Apache as www-data) write data to a directory (like an image upload)?

I had been piping in to a suid Perl script whose job it was to do the security and data integrity checks before writing the file. Do I now build a C wrapper to do this?

[ related topics: Free Software Interactive Drama Perl Open Source Writing Heinlein Community hubris ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2012-01-04 03:46:49.653399+01 by: spc476

It's what I would do. And it wouldn't have to be very much C code. Pretty much just a call to exec() and set the suid bit on the program.

#Comment Re: made: 2012-01-04 04:04:27.66618+01 by: Dan Lyke

Yeah. In fact my Perl program was kind of structured that way, it loads a library in which all of the real development is done so that I don't actually have to tweak the file in question.

Just a pain in the ass.

#Comment Re: made: 2012-01-04 12:20:54.703683+01 by: John Anderson

Maybe I don't understand exactly what you're trying to do, but wouldn't it be easier to just chown the directory to www-data? (Or do the same with group-write permissions?)

#Comment Re: made: 2012-01-04 15:23:40.365443+01 by: Dan Lyke

The directory gets written from enough different processes that although I could do chmod a+w, it seems much smarter to me to have something that gets a token, and that verifies that what gets put in the directory is indeed a JPEG, and all the thumbnails and such get created appropriately.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.