2013-12-31 22:19:47.140241+01 by Dan Lyke 1 comments
Julian Sanchez: Lord Camden on NSA Surveillance. On how the "founding fathers" and framers of the Constitution were envisioning exactly the current scenario when they wrote the 4th Amendment.
[ related topics: Law Civil Liberties ]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2013-12-31 22:47:37.939996+01 by: Jack William Bell
That link backs up something I've been saying for a while: the fourth amendment already protects us against this kind of crap, but the government is breaking the law. We don't need to change the fourth amendment at all, just enforce it.
A while back I took a shot at explaining why we might want to consider changing/upgrading the fifth amendement to deal with digital data. If we start from the assumption NOTHING is private going forward, an expanded right against self-incrimination might be the best way to protect your average person from abuses. (Including abuses from faked data.) And, in the meantime, the government can still get a warrant for suspected criminals and terrorists.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.