Flutterby™! : CIA/NSA as VC

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

CIA/NSA as VC

2014-01-12 15:27:12.971477+01 by meuon 4 comments

In-Q-Tel is the US CIA and "Intelligence Community") acting as Venture Capitalists. It has a public portfolio and I am sure a private one... You might want to be aware who the VC in your vendors are, and their vendors.. and...

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2014-01-13 08:26:29.446937+01 by: ebwolf

Suprised you didn't know about In-Q-Tel. I know several people with startups and small tech firms funded by them. In the GeoWeb, they are about the only ones investing.

#Comment Re: made: 2014-01-13 18:13:44.401037+01 by: meuon [edit history]

"they are the only ones investing" - As I consider "GeoWeb" a lot of real stuff working with real data, that's interesting. They tout that they leverage other VC, or seed it. Does their involvement scare off other VC?

#Comment Re: made: 2014-01-14 08:09:23.441446+01 by: ebwolf

Not sure what the problem is with Geo and VCs. I think part of the problem is the 800lb Gorilla (Esri). They are so entrenched that a company has to be in serious startup land (like Waze and Foursquare) to attract private VC. Otherwise, In-Q-Tel invests because the CIA needs a second source besides Esri.

FortiusOne/GeoIQ/Geocommons was funded by In-Q-Tel but ultimately picked up by Esri in a firesale as government contracts dried up due to budgetary issues.

About one week later, OpenGeo latched onto the In-Q-Tel nipple. They are a clear example of the CIA trying to maintain a viable second source to Esri.

#Comment Re: made: 2014-01-14 14:58:07.205927+01 by: meuon

That makes a lot of sense, thanks for the insight from a former insider.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.