So can Google really not hire competent
2020-01-19 17:10:09.319747+00 by Dan Lyke 3 comments
So can Google really not hire competent UX designers, or are there other reasons Google Photos is so inscrutable?
2020-01-19 17:10:09.319747+00 by Dan Lyke 3 comments
So can Google really not hire competent UX designers, or are there other reasons Google Photos is so inscrutable?
[ related topics: Photography ]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: So can Google really not hire competent made: 2020-01-19 21:28:03.141431+00 by: mkelley
I started using Amazon Photos instead. It is better but they're all UI by committee.
#Comment Re: So can Google really not hire competent made: 2020-01-20 18:48:49.201268+00 by: Dan Lyke
I guess it's back to Digikam. Which sucks because it's not shared, but also doesn't suck because it's not shared...
#Comment Re: So can Google really not hire competent made: 2020-01-20 22:10:56.94555+00 by: markd
PicasaWeb was really nice (even if one didn't use Picasa). But the Whole G+ ruined it, and it hasn't recovered. I've got a bunch of albums (photos plus even better commentary) I can't find any more :-(
(If anyone ever actually uses Webmention/indie-action to post here, please email me)
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.