Flutterby™! : PlanDemic debunking

PlanDemic debunking

2020-05-07 18:18:53.452361+00 by Dan Lyke 4 comments

Also so I can find it again when I need to Big ol' Google Doc with lots of links about PlanDemic and Judy Mikovits

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: PlanDemic debunking made: 2020-05-07 18:45:26.665524+00 by: brennen

Good timing. This one seems to be making the rounds with my more conspiracy-inclined acquaintances.

#Comment Re: PlanDemic debunking made: 2020-05-07 23:51:10.745068+00 by: TheSHAD0W

Yeah, there's a lot of conspiracy theory out there about the epidemic either being deliberate or fake. Gonna have to rank that as probably untrue. But censoring the arguments is a good way to get Streisanded.

Also, it's a bit less fantastic to theorize that a pharmaceutical industry is overjoyed at being able to sell a vaccine for a decent profit, and even happier that it might possibly become mandatory. (Unless it's better than 90% effective I can't support that, and it's looking probable it'll be more like the influenza vaccine at 50-66%.)

But some of the crap that's being proposed is horrifying. https://www.theorganicprepper....chools-after-covid-prison-camps/ And yeah, take that site with a grain of salt, but it looks like they're citing a real document. Frankly, if this is the extent to which you're going, I'd rather let the virus run rampant.

"Never let a good crisis go to waste" is always something to look out for.

#Comment Re: PlanDemic debunking made: 2020-05-14 08:27:09.629486+00 by: TheSHAD0W

https://www.bitchute.com/video/-bxLzaHgtf4/

#Comment Re: PlanDemic debunking made: 2020-05-21 15:23:54.43031+00 by: TheSHAD0W [edit history]

https://reclaimthenet.org/goog...-takes-down-user-file-plandemic/

Uh, yeahhhh...

Edit: Looks like it was taken down because that person was sharing the video with others via the service. I can understand limiting external access, but removing it from the account was IMO too much. What happens if their enforcement bot decides the wrong file if verboten? Bad optics.

Add your own comment:

(If anyone ever actually uses Webmention/indie-action to post here, please email me)

Format with:

(You should probably use "Text" mode: URLs will be mostly recognized and linked, _underscore quoted_ text is looked up in a glossary, _underscore quoted_ (http://xyz.pdq) becomes a link, without the link in the parenthesis it becomes a <cite> tag. All <cite>ed text will point to the Flutterby knowledge base. Two enters (ie: a blank line) gets you a new paragraph, special treatment for paragraphs that are manually indented or start with "#" (as in "#include" or "#!/usr/bin/perl"), "/* " or ">" (as in a quoted message) or look like lists, or within a paragraph you can use a number of HTML tags:

p, img, br, hr, a, sub, sup, tt, i, b, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, cite, em, strong, code, samp, kbd, pre, blockquote, address, ol, dl, ul, dt, dd, li, dir, menu, table, tr, td, th

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.

Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke

for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.