HTML 2 was a mistake
2023-10-23 18:55:02.778456+02 by Dan Lyke 6 comments
HTML 2 was a mistake. All subsequent HTML-adjacent technologies likewise.
2023-10-23 18:55:02.778456+02 by Dan Lyke 6 comments
HTML 2 was a mistake. All subsequent HTML-adjacent technologies likewise.
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: HTML 2 was a mistake made: 2023-10-23 23:25:59.432566+02 by: spc476
I don't know about that … HTML 1 was pretty sparse.
#Comment Re: HTML 2 was a mistake made: 2023-10-24 00:00:24.759289+02 by: Dan Lyke
Yeah, if we could have had tables, but use them for table-ish things (maybe with float="..."
), I'd have been okay with that.
#Comment Re: HTML 2 was a mistake made: 2023-10-24 03:47:01.333914+02 by: spc476
I find HTML 4 and CSS to be good (and I don't use tables at all for layout). I think I could get by with HTML 4.01 strict if it weren't for one or two problematic entries I should probably rethink.
#Comment Re: HTML 2 was a mistake made: 2023-10-24 14:28:01.38254+02 by: brainopener
I feel obligated to point out Project Gemini: https://geminiprotocol.net
#Comment Re: HTML 2 was a mistake made: 2023-10-24 22:11:21.780634+02 by: spc476 [edit history]
And I feel obligated to point out that I wrote the first Gemini server, before the creator of the protocol wrote a server himself (source code).
But in general, I've found the Gemini document format too limiting for my own tastes.
#Comment Re: HTML 2 was a mistake made: 2023-10-25 22:36:57.601407+02 by: Dan Lyke
Yeah, I use this as a place to store my history, and without http(s) urls that kinda gets limiting.
But maybe I just need to suck up that those'll be external links somehow...
(If anyone ever actually uses Webmention/indie-action to post here, please email me)
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.
Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by
Dan Lyke for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.