Susie Bright
2001-05-17 02:05:41+02 by
Dan Lyke
2 comments
[ related topics:
Books Sexual Culture
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment made: 2002-02-21 06:31:42+01 by:
other_todd
I'm curious to know where you think the most recent BAE's have gone astray, Dan, and not because I'm preparing to disagree with you, but because I want to compare notes. (And I promise not to be thin-skinned just because I have a story in the most recent one.)
#Comment made: 2002-02-21 06:31:42+01 by:
Dan Lyke
I don't think I can codify it too closely except that I've just found that the recent ones have migrated to bookshelves far from my bedroom. In BAE 2000 I found a couple that squicked me 'cause of their death themes, in BAE 2001 I found that character development just wasn't terribly strong.
(Even though we don't share that particular kink, I did like the twist in yours...)
I think part of it is something that Mary Anne Mohanraj said in her journal when she was talking about editing Aqua Erotica
, about trying to appeal to a mix of tastes. Perhaps the mix has grown to the point where from finding 2 or 3 in a compendium to finding one every other or so.
I'm kind of over the "mix of tastes", I'd rather editors pick a focus so I'd like more in a book.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.