wiretap ruling
2001-05-22 17:37:55+02 by
Dan Lyke
1 comments
Supreme Court upholds first amendment in cell phone bugging case. What made this interesting to me, besides the fact that it's news that the first amendment was upheld, was what this might mean when COPA
, specifically some of the child pornography bits, comes under scrutiny:
...the court ruled narrowly on whether a publisher who came by useful information
legally may be punished because the information was gathered illegally.
[ related topics:
Children and growing up Politics Sexual Culture
]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment made: 2002-02-21 06:31:42+01 by:
Pete
I know what you're thinking, and don't count on it. None of us will live so long as to ever see a legal distinction made between distributing child porn and creating said junk. Look at the panic in Britain; it's like a commie scare or something.
We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your
comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel
they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine,
if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't
try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted
if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and
more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave
such ridicule in place.