Flutterby™! : .NET on Un*x? .NOT.

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

.NET on Un*x? .NOT.

2004-02-13 18:39:20.152054+01 by Dan Lyke 0 comments

Mono and dotGNU: what's the point? echoes some of my own thoughts on the matter. Yesterday Phil was trying to make a replaceable word in a message a different format. We suggested a couple of different methods, but each one of them was far easier to implement in GTK than System.Windows.Forms; from using internal formatting to just using three text fields.

As a .NET developer, and as I prepare to move Charlene's computing over to Linux, I'm continually reminded that Windows, and especially .NET, has a long way to go to catch up with modern Linux. What it does have is a popular application suite, but the operating system and the GUI shell are stuck back in the dark ages as a result of bad architectural decisions and inexperienced kludges on top of other kludges. Trying to follow Microsoft[Wiki]'s lead is a bad idea, indeed this might be exactly what Microsoft[Wiki] wanted: Drag the smart guys in the Mono development group down a dead end, and keep their energies from going into something innovative.

[ related topics: Free Software Microsoft Open Source moron ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.