Flutterby™! : Simulated child porn?

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

Simulated child porn?

2004-03-09 18:21:55.91595+01 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

World Sex News Daily mentioned this short Q&A with Elisha Cuthbert about The Girl Next Door, which contained this gem:

Can you talk about the movie's nude scenes?

That was a body double. I was only 17 at the time...

What is the current legal status of "simulated child pornography"?

[ related topics: Sexual Culture Movies Law Current Events ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: made: 2004-03-09 20:08:32.351597+01 by: TheSHAD0W

The "simulated child porn" laws have been invalidated by the Supremes. But the question isn't really whether the body double was substituting for an underaged ACTRESS; it's whether she was subbing for an underaged CHARACTER. The actress may have been playing an older character.

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.