Geisha
2004-09-27 03:29:44.75387+00 by Dan Lyke 1 comments
This weekend was the first one we've had where we weren't struggling to finish something, so when I got home from the hike Charlene was raring to go out. We settled on a trek down to the San Francisco Asian Art Museum to catch the last day of Geisha: Behind the Painted Smile. We were both disappointed.
I realize that large art museums aren't in the business of entertainment, nor really education, they're in the business of hyping up the art of their large donors so that said donors' collections will have greater value, but the context and content of this exhibit were the most disappointed I've been since the Ansel Adams exhibit at SFMOMA. And unlike the Adams exhibit, I wasn't really familiar with the subject matter.
Beyond the basic problem, that with better flow control and exhibit layout they could have increased their viewer throughput dramatically, it came down to my usual complaint: All curators should be required to read the basic texts of information design. Start with consistent language and if you're using terms that differ because of cultural context from their normal meanings, then define them; this applies specifically to "courtesan" and "prostitute". If you're expecting huge crowds, where people will be standing in front of works reading each legend, how about making larger panels up above with detail information so you don't keep repeating "Edo (now Tokyo)". How about some maps so that when you talk about regions of Edo, we have some sense of geography? If it were just one section, like Yoshiwara, then fine, give me a label and move on, but especially if you're going to reference geography, then I want more information.
How can you have an entire exhibit about how geisha weren't sexual despite constant pairings with "courtesan" and "prostitute" and not mention shunga, even once for context?
And while it's great to see a kimono hung flat, one or two on mannequins for a little more context, even if they were modern day reproductions, would have been really nice to see.
Overall we came away with more questions than we went in with, feeling like the descriptions and prose had glossed over large chunks of history and context with some sort of agenda.