Aerial Photography (redux)
2005-03-22 21:14:08.9265+00 by ebradway 6 comments
2005-03-22 21:14:08.9265+00 by ebradway 6 comments
[ related topics: Photography Invention and Design Work, productivity and environment Eric's Life Maps & Mapping ]
comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):
#Comment Re: made: 2005-03-22 21:41:24.401589+00 by: ebradway
Also, I am considering returning the Stylus 410. I can get an Olympus C-60 for just a little more money. It's 6Mpix and only a little heavier (198g vs. 159g). Has anyone had any personal experience with the C-60?
#Comment Re: made: 2005-03-22 21:57:13.474224+00 by: Dan Lyke
Okay, now that you've got my interest piqued, how about some pictures from the camera?
#Comment Re: made: 2005-03-23 00:04:47.754666+00 by: ebradway [edit history]
Ok... I needed to run out the office before I had a chance to setup an online gallery. Here are some images:
And the raison d'etre, a 400ft image georeferenced to the ground control points:
#Comment Re: made: 2005-03-23 00:34:16.528663+00 by: Dan Lyke
Cool. Too bad Ben doesn't yet have texture paging in VTP, but it does make me want to see how to integrate external imagery into WorldWind.
#Comment Re: made: 2005-03-23 02:43:51.409216+00 by: meuon [edit history]
CONGRATS! That is SWEET! - I like that you essentially went 'analog' - much simpler. And the pic quality in excellent!
Any reason to strip plastic cases and such off for a few more ounces of weight savings?
#Comment Re: made: 2005-03-23 13:35:02.761469+00 by: ebradway [edit history]
The current weight is quite fine. I will be redesigning the gondola chassis so it will be lighter and provide three outriggers for the tethers to help stabalize the platform. I will also spend some time looking for better tether.
The two avantages to further weight reductions are:
Some things I plan to test on my next flight: