Flutterby™! : incompetence

Next unread comment / Catchup all unread comments User Account Info | Logout | XML/Pilot/etc versions | Long version (with comments) | Weblog archives | Site Map | | Browse Topics

incompetence

2007-03-30 17:35:51.509261+02 by Dan Lyke 1 comments

Hey, you know those US Attorneys who were fired for allegedly "underperforming"? Yeah, one of the ones that the Bush Administration thinks is competent (which, as we've noted before, may just mean loyal to Bush (presumably over the law or the Constitution)) just cost the U.S. government a hundred million bucks.. The judge in the case is apologetic:

"I've come to the conclusion, very reluctantly, that I have no authority to order restitution," Friedman said. "I hope the government will appeal me."

but the plea bargain papers noted the wrong statute.

[ related topics: Politics moron Law Civil Liberties ]

comments in ascending chronological order (reverse):

#Comment Re: Was it a mistake? made: 2007-03-31 16:21:32.38463+02 by: m

As someone said, one of the worst things about this administration is that it makes me feel like a nutbar conspiracy theorist. I have started to wonder about everything.

Was this truly an error on the part of the US Attorney, or was it intentional? What kind of a bribe would be required for such an action?

Comment policy

We will not edit your comments. However, we may delete your comments, or cause them to be hidden behind another link, if we feel they detract from the conversation. Commercial plugs are fine, if they are relevant to the conversation, and if you don't try to pretend to be a consumer. Annoying endorsements will be deleted if you're lucky, if you're not a whole bunch of people smarter and more articulate than you will ridicule you, and we will leave such ridicule in place.


Flutterby™ is a trademark claimed by

Dan Lyke
for the web publications at www.flutterby.com and www.flutterby.net.