Yesterday afternoon we went down to Copperfield's to see Mac Barnett in conversation with
Jon Scieszka about Mac's new book Make Believe: On Telling Stories To
Children. Two funny people talking very thoughtfully about relating to children. If
you have the opportunity to hear 'em talk, do.
Love me a good takedown of.... investments of dubious quality, especially since I ran into
the "EM thruster" stuff back when I was doing the transporation consulting: Ars Technica: Casimir force co-opted to generate free
energy, midichlorians not included
This week, a company called Casimir Inc. emerged from stealth mode to
announce that it had raised significant funding from venture capitalists willing to roll
the dice on free energy. Thats right: a startup has gotten serious backing to develop
sources of perpetual free energy. The people behind this fantastic new energy generator
also brought us the wildly successful
WTF thruster EM-drive that could supposedly directly convert
electricity into a propulsive force.
Over the years I've read with horror the various things that state schools have done to
native and indigenous children and families, but often assuaged that sense with the notion
that this was all in the past, or in Canada, historical harms, and surely we were more
civilized now...
NPR:
Native kids with disabilities were held in wooden boxes. Sweeping reforms are coming
FORT COVINGTON, N.Y. Rumors spread on social media over the winter: School
kids with disabilities in the Salmon River Central School District, including Akwesasne
Mohawk children, were being confined by special education teachers in wooden boxes. Sarah
Konwahahawi Herne was devastated.
LLM hallucinations in the wild: Large-
scale evidence from non-existent citations Zhenyue Zhao, Yihe Wang, Toby Stuart,
Mathijs De Vaan, Paul Ginsparg, Yian Yin
Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate plausible but false
information across a wide range of contexts, yet the real-world magnitude and consequences
of this hallucination problem remain poorly understood. Here we leverage a uniquely
verifiable object - scientific citations - to audit 111 million references across 2.5
million papers in arXiv, bioRxiv, SSRN, and PubMed Central. We find a sharp rise in non-
existent references following widespread LLM adoption, with a conservative estimate of
146,932 hallucinated citations in 2025 alone. These errors are diffusely embedded across
many papers but especially pronounced in fields with rapid AI uptake, in manuscripts with
linguistic signatures of AI-assisted writing, and among small and early-career author
teams. At the same time, hallucinated references disproportionately assign credit to
already prominent and male scholars, suggesting that LLM-generated errors may reinforce
existing inequities in scientific recognition. Preprint moderation and journal publication
processes capture only a fraction of these errors, suggesting that the spread of
hallucinated content has outpaced existing safeguards. Together, these findings
demonstrate that LLM hallucinations are infiltrating knowledge production at scale,
threatening both the reliability and equity of future scientific discovery as human and AI
systems draw on the existing literature.
Which brings us to: Fuck yeah! Tech Crunch:
Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work.
404 Media:
ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop
One of the amazing things about this is the number of people who are whining that it's
unfair that they've actually read the work they're citing, or are creating other
hypotheticals. This
doofucs on the Fediverse is, for instance, willing to lay the blame on his co-authors
in order to take the credit.
It gets worse if you head over to X/Twitter, which... I'm not gonna link to individually,
you can find your own list off of Thomas G. Dietterich
@tdietterich's announcement of the policy there, but honestly, people if these are the
arguments y'all are making in good faith, academia is irretrievably broken.
Which I've long contented anyway, but... damn...
Reading the Suisun Expansion Specific Plan ("California Forever"), and mostly it's a look at how we could have beautiful things in our own cities if we could balance out the voices of the older NIMBY automobile violence advocates.
And maybe allow a little less emphasis on the voices of people who live in sprawl outside the city...
Took Charlene for some medical tests, while she was in with the tech the people behind the desk were talking about "what's cool with the kids". One mentioned a Hacky Sack, another asked "What's a Hacky Sack?"
I just had to interject: "Some of you spent the '90s sober, and it shows."