[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Follow up
- To: <idrama@flutterby.com>
- Subject: RE: Follow up
- From: "Kyle Pierce" <kyle.pierce@pcisys.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 21:27:39 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <72.91e1ca9.27f62497@aol.com>
- Sender: owner-idrama@flutterby.com
Walt,
Thanks for your encouragement and your efforts to give this group a kick in
the pants. I certainly encourage you to post the essay on metaphor, given
your previous thoughts on that topic which I found most interesting, but was
unable to give a decent response at the time.
Kyle
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-idrama@flutterby.com [mailto:owner-idrama@flutterby.com]On
> Behalf Of WFreitag@aol.com
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 11:04 AM
> To: idrama@flutterby.com
> Subject: Follow up
>
>
> After the recent round of increasingly interesting discussion followed by
> sudden profound silence, a pattern that appears to recur, I'm
> beginning to
> think it may be worthwhile to inquire into why that happens. Does the
> inevitable emergence of the same old fundamental and so far irresolvable
> issues cause frustration? Does the discussion get so complex that
> it becomes
> too difficult to go on? Do people feel that their comments are not being
> understood or appreciated?