[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Participation versus Interactivity
- To: Dan Lyke <danlyke@flutterby.com>, idrama <idrama@flutterby.com>
- Subject: Re: Participation versus Interactivity
- From: Chris Crawford <chriscrawford@wave.net>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 12:37:34 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <15330.61409.148180.774026@flutterby.com>
- Sender: owner-idrama@flutterby.com.mail.flutterby.com
- User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
> Last night after Scotch Night, Kiki, artist extraordinaire and creator
> of the Firefall, commented that she wasn't as interested in
> interactivity as she was in participation.
Participation is one small step up from reaction. People at a concert who
clap their hands, sing along, hum along, or dance are participating in the
art of the musicians. I should think that most performance artists would
want their audience to participate in some fashion. Nothing new or
particularly innovative there.
Chris