[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ART vs. DRAMA
- To: idrama@flutterby.com
- Subject: ART vs. DRAMA
- From: "Brandon J. Van Every" <vanevery@indiegamedesign.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:42:22 -0700
- In-reply-to: <1118599950.42ac7b0e48d85@webmail.iu.edu>
- Organization: Indie Game Design
- References: <1118599950.42ac7b0e48d85@webmail.iu.edu>
- Reply-to: idrama@flutterby.com
- Sender: owner-idrama@mail.flutterby.com
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
thom@indiana.edu wrote:
I originally objected when it was suggested that randomly generated art could
be in the mix as eye candy. I objected because real ART has never worked this
way.
Are you just a dramatist with a deep prejudice against the history of
the visual arts? Go look up the Surrealist experiments with frottage,
or Dadaist concerns with chaos and chance. But perhaps you don't think
Marcel Duchamp's "Standard Stoppages" are ART either, though they hang
in the museum and art historians do call them such. It seems your
definition of ART is no more than "what you personally care about." Are
you sure when you say ART, you don't really mean DRAMA?
Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
20% of the world is real.
80% is gobbledygook we make up inside our own heads.